Dynamics of Predator-Prey Model with Holling Type II Involving Predator Stage-Structured and Cannibalism

Sela Tri Indah Sari, Dian Savitri

Abstract


Predator–prey models with nonlinear functional responses provide a robust framework for understanding population regulation and oscillatory dynamics. This study analyzes a three-dimensional predator–prey model incorporating Holling type II functional responses, explicit predator stage structure, and cannibalism. The primary objective is to investigate how adult predation, maturation, and cannibalism parameters influence equilibrium stability and the emergence of oscillations through Hopf bifurcation. Analytical results establish the existence and local stability of a positive coexistence equilibrium. For a biologically relevant parameter set, numerical simulations demonstrate that trajectories converge to the coexistence equilibrium (59.9078, 23.9092, 56.0552). This state is locally asymptotically stable, as the real parts of all Jacobian eigenvalues are negative. Numerical continuation methods are employed to detect Hopf bifurcations induced by key parameters. Two Hopf points are identified for the adult predation rate at 0.4211 and 8.7725, while the maturation rate induces bifurcations at 0.2661 and 0.5271. Additionally, the cannibalism parameter triggers a Hopf bifurcation at 0.1835, initiating periodic population oscillations. These results demonstrate that maturation and cannibalism define distinct instability thresholds, jointly governing the transition from stable coexistence to sustained oscillatory dynamics in stage-structured systems


Keywords


Cannibalism; Dynamical Analysis; Holling Type II; Hopf Bifurcation; Stage- Structured

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] A J Lotka. Elements of Mathematical Biology. Publications, 1956.

[2] Vito Volterra. “Fluctuations in The Abundance of a Species Considered Mathematically”. In: Nature 118.2972 (1926), pp. 558–560.

[3] C. S. Holling. “Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism”. In: The Canadian Entomologist 91.7 (1959), pp. 385–398. doi: 10.4039/Ent91385-7.

[4] Shuangte Wang et al. “The Dynamical Behavior of a Predator-Prey System with Holling Type II Functional Response and Allee Effect”. In: Applied Mathematics 11.05 (2020), pp. 1–19. doi: 10.4236/am.2020.115029.

[5] Lazarus Kalvein Beay et al. “Hopf Bifurcation and Stability Analysis of The Rosenzweig–MacArthur Predator–Prey Model with Stage-Structure in Prey”. In: Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 17.4 (2020), pp. 4080–4097. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020226.

[6] Salima Helali, Dorsaf Laribi, and Haifa Ben Fredj. “Two-Prey Predator Model with Holling Type-II Functional Response and Multiple Delays: Hopf–Bifurcation Analysis, Parameters Estimation, and Capture Prediction”. In: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71 (2025), pp. 7691–7724. doi: 10.1007/s12190-025-02544-7.

[7] Xiangjun Dai et al. “Survival Analysis of a Predator–Prey Model with Seasonal Migration of Prey Populations between Breeding and Non-Breeding Regions”. In: Mathematics 11.18 (2023). doi: 10.3390/math11183838.

[8] Érika Diz-Pita. “Global Dynamics of a Predator-Prey System with Immigration in Both Species”. In: Electronic Research Archive 32.2 (2024), pp. 762–778. doi: 10.3934/era.2024036.

[9] Fitri Nur Azizah et al. “The Effect of Refugia on Prey-Predator Model with Parasite Infection”. In: International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Sciences, and Technology for National Defense 2.2 (2024). doi: 10.58524/app.sci.def.v2i2.423.

[10] Jingen Yang et al. “Spatiotemporal Dynamics of a Predator–Prey Model with Harvest and Disease in Prey”. In: Mathematics 13.15 (2025). doi: 10.3390/math13152474.

[11] Nada A. Almuallem, Hasanur Mollah, and Sahabuddin Sarwardi. “A study of a Prey-Predator Model with Disease in Predator Including Gestation Delay, Dreatment and Linear Harvesting of Predator Species”. In: AIMS Mathematics 10.6 (2025), pp. 14657–14698. doi: 10.3934/math.2025660.

[12] Daifeng Duan et al. “The Dynamical Analysis of a Nonlocal Predator-Prey Model with Cannibalism”. In: European Journal of Applied Mathematics 35.5 (2024), pp. 707–731. doi: 10.1017/S0956792524000019.

[13] Gary A. Polis. “The Evolution and Dynamics of Intraspecific Predation”. In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12 (1981), pp. 225–251. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001301.

[14] Qifa Lin et al. “Global attractivity of Leslie–Gower predator–prey Model Incorporating Prey Cannibalism”. In: Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models 2020 (2020). doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02609-w.

[15] P. Mishra, S.N. Raw, and B. Tiwari. “On a Cannibalistic Predator–Prey Model with Prey Defense and Diffusion”. In: Applied Mathematical Modelling 90 (2021), pp. 165–190. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.060.

[16] Francisco J. Fernández et al. “Do Development and Diet Determine the Degree of Cannibalism in Insects? To Eat or Not to Eat Conspecifics”. In: Insects 11.4 (2020), p. 242. doi: 10.3390/insects11040242.

[17] Erica L. Wildy and Matthew R. Whiles. “Cannibalism and Intraguild Predation Among Larval Amphibians Under Natural Conditions”. In: Ecology 102.5 (2021), e03320. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3320.

[18] Carlos A. Sepúlveda-Quiroz et al. “Tryptophan Reduces Intracohort Cannibalism Behavior in Tropical Gar (Atractosteus tropicus) Larvae”. In: Fishes 9.1 (2024), p. 40. doi: 10.3390/fishes9010040.

[19] Luis A. Ebensperger, Lynne D. Hayes, and Javier Ramírez-Estrada. “Sex-Specific Variation in Filial Cannibalism Among Mammals”. In: Biological Reviews 95.6 (2020), pp. 1559–1575. doi: 10.1111/brv.12640.

[20] Carlos S. Matos, Rafael S. Silva, and Daniel M. Oliveira. “First Record of Cannibalism in The Red-Finger Rubble Crab Eriphia Gonagra in a Natural Environment”. In: Journal of Crustacean Biology 45.1 (2025), ruae005. doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/ruae005.

[21] Lawrence R. Fox. “Cannibalism in Natural Populations”. In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6 (1975), pp. 87–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.000511.

[22] Mark A Elgar and Bernard J Crespi. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. 361 p. Oxford, England; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

[23] J. Li and Z. Zhu. “Impact of Cannibalism on Dynamics of a Structured Predator–Prey System”. In: Applied Mathematical Modelling 78 (2020), pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.022.

[24] Y. Wei. “Stability Analysis of a Stage-Structure Predator–Prey System with Time Delay”. In: Axioms 11.8 (2022), p. 421. doi: 10.3390/axioms11080421.

[25] X. Li. “Global Analysis of a Juvenile-Adult Model for Cannibalistic Interactions”. In: International Journal of Biomathematics 14.1 (2021), p. 2150045. doi: 10.1142/S1793524521500455.

[26] Fengqin Zhang, Yuming Chen, and Jianquan Li. “Dynamical Analysis of a Stage-Structured Predator-Prey Model with Cannibalism”. In: Mathematical Biosciences 307 (2019), pp. 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.11.004.

[27] Maya Rayungsari et al. “Dynamical Analysis of a Predator-Prey Model Incorporating Predator Cannibalism and Refuge”. In: Axioms 11.3 (2022), p. 116. doi: 10.3390/axioms11030116.

[28] Tao Zheng et al. “Stability and Hopf Bifurcation of a Stage-Structured Cannibalism Model with Two Delays”. In: International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 31.12 (2021), p. 2150242. doi: 10.1142/S0218127421502424.

[29] R. Dinnullah. “A Discrete Numerical Scheme of Modified Leslie-Gower with Harvesting Model”. In: CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi 5.2 (2018), pp. 65–72. doi: 10.18860/ca.v5i2.4716.

[30] Prisalo Luis et al. “Implementation of Non-Standard Finite Difference on a Predator–Prey Model Considering Cannibalism on Predator and Harvesting on Prey”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics (JJBM) 6.1 (2025), pp. 35–43. doi: 10.37905/jjbm.v6i1.30550.

[31] Muhammad Ikbal. “Stability Analysis of the Two Prey–One Predator Model with Harvesting of the Prey”. In: MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika 13.3 (2025), pp. 388–394. doi: 10.26740/mathunesa.v13n3.p388-394.

[32] Aaraf Abdulsatar Alani and Raid Kamel Naji. “The Role of Prey Vigilance, Cannibalism, and Hunting Cooperation on Prey-Predator Dynamics”. In: Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience 2025 (2025), Article ID 112. doi: 10.28919/cmbn/9513.

[33] Ahmed Sami Abdulghafour and Raid Kamel Naji. “Modeling and Analysis of a Prey–Predator System Incorporating Fear, Predator-Dependent Refuge, and Cannibalism”. In: Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience (2022), Article ID 106. doi: 10.28919/cmbn/7722.

[34] Dian Savitri and Hasan S. Panigoro. “Hopf bifurcation in the prey-predator-super predator model with different response functions”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics 1.2 (2020), pp. 65–70. doi: 10.34312/jjbm.v1i2.8399.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.41044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Savitri, Sela Tri Indah Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.