Risk Analysis of Shallot Farm Income Using D-vine Copula-Based Monte Carlo Simulation

Fatimah Fuzzaroh, Berlian Setiawaty, I Gusti Putu Purnaba

Abstract


Shallot farm income is highly uncertain due to fluctuations in yields, prices, and production costs, which are interdependent and significantly correlated. This study evaluates income risk by modeling the dependence structure among the variables that constitute income, while addressing data limitations. Two approaches are employed. First, a parametric approach models income as a univariate variable under the assumption of a normal distribution, ignoring dependence among its components. Second, a multivariate simulation approach utilizes a D-vine copula, combined with Monte Carlo simulation, to capture the dependence among income components and generate synthetic observations that better represent tail behavior. Risk is measured using Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) based on 32 observations of average shallot farm income per harvest season over the period 2014–2024, and the results are compared with empirical estimates. Due to limited data, the empirical approach produces relatively coarse estimates, particularly in the tail region. The normal distribution approach yields higher and smoother estimates, indicating a higher level of risk. In contrast, the D-vine copula approach provides lower estimates than the normal distribution. These differences indicate that each method offers a distinct perspective on income risk.

Keywords


D-vine copula; Expected shortfall; Monte Carlo simulation; Value at Risk

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Ary Bakhtiar, Mulia Salsabila, and Mohd Fauzi bin Kamarudin. “Prospects for Shallots Agribusiness Development in Pamekasan Regency”. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, Mar. 2025, pp. 451–464. DOI: 10.31186/jagrisep.24.01.451-464 .
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. Komoditas Pertanian Subsektor Hortikultura Bawang Merah. Tech. rep. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Kementerian Pertanian, 2023. URL: https://satudata.pertanian.go.id/assets/docs/publikasi/Outlook_Bawang_Merah_2023.pdf .
  3. Aulia Adetya, Dwi Rachmina, and Lukman Mohammad Baga. “The Influence of Farmer Entrepreneurial Behavior on Shallot Farming Performance”. Jurnal Agrisep: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 24.2 (2025), pp. 579–600. DOI: 10.31186/jagrisep.24.02.579-600 .
  4. Yogi Ricardo, Camelya Francisca, Ela Amelia, and Dina Dwirayani. “Analysis of Shallot Farming Income in Pabedilan District, Cirebon Regency”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Agrosci) 2.6 (2025), pp. 372–382. DOI: 10.62885/agrosci.v2i6.816 .
  5. Dewi Sahara et al. “Sustainability of Shallot Farming System in Lowland Central Java Province, Indonesia: MICMAC Analysis Approach”. Environmental Challenges 20 (2025), p. 101212. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2025.101212 .
  6. Sriyadi, Zuhud Rozaki, and Wiwi Susanti. “Risk Behavior of Shallot Farmers in Highland and Lowland Regions of Java, Indonesia”. Organic Farming 11.1 (2025), pp. 49–60. DOI: 10.56578/of110104 .
  7. Triyono, Lusi Soviyanti, Nur Rahmawati, Sutrisno, and Mhd Fauzi Kamarudin. “Income Risk Analysis and Sustainability of Shallot Farming in Bantul Yogyakarta, Indonesia”. In: BIO Web of Conferences (ICAFS 2025). Vol. 208. EDP Sciences, 2026, p. 01005. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/202620801005 .
  8. Yueming Cheng. “Monte Carlo-Based VaR Estimation and Backtesting Under Basel III”. Risks 13 (2025), p. 146. DOI: 10.3390/risks13080146 .
  9. N. Palupi, A. Listyaningrum, and G. B. Nugraha. UGM and PT Pupuk Indonesia Advance Agricultural Efficiency through Precision Farming Technology. Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada; Accessed: 2026-03-29. Nov. 2025. URL: https://ugm.ac.id/en/news/ugm-and-pt-pupuk-indonesia-advance-agricultural-efficiency-through-precision-farming-technology/ .
  10. Yan Sun and Ke Wang. “The Implication of Copula-Based Models for Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Under Systemic Risk”. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (2022), p. 916494. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.916494 .
  11. Marwah Soliman, Nathaniel K. Newlands, Vyacheslav Lyubchich, and Yulia R. Gel. “Multivariate Copula Modeling for Improving Agricultural Risk Assessment under Climate Variability”. Variance 16.1 (2023), pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.66573/001c.74221 .
  12. Resminawati, Retno Budiarti, and I Wayan Mangku. “Pembandingan Metode Copula dan D-vine Copula dalam Estimasi Tail Value at Risk pada Komoditas Pertanian”. Thesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2021. URL: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/107803 .
  13. Xianli Wang, Zhigang Zhao, Feilong Jie, Jingjing Xu, Sheng Li, Kun Hao, and Youliang Peng. “A Copula Function–Monte Carlo Method-Based Assessment of the Risk of Agricultural Water Demand in Xinjiang, China”. Agriculture 14.11 (2024), p. 2000. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14112000 .
  14. Stuart A. Klugman, Harry H. Panjer, and Gordon E. Willmot. Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781118787106 .
  15. Norman L. Johnson, Samuel Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Volume 2. 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1995. URL: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Continuous+Univariate+Distributions%2C+Volume+2%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780471584940 .
  16. Roger B. Nelsen. An Introduction to Copulas. 2nd ed. Springer, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28678-0 .
  17. Eike Christian Brechmann and Ulf Schepsmeier. “Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine”. Journal of Statistical Software 52.3 (2013), pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v052.i03 .
  18. Claudia Czado and Thomas Nagler. “Vine Copula Based Modeling”. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 9 (2022), pp. 453–477. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-040220-101153 .
  19. Emese Lazar, Jingqi Pan, and Shixuan Wang. “On the Estimation of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at Extreme Levels”. Journal of Commodity Markets 34 (2024), p. 100391. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100391 .
  20. Turnika Afdatul Rafni and Dina Agustina. “Risk Comparison in Optimal Portfolios: A Study of Value at Risk (VaR) and Tail Value at Risk (TVaR)”. Mathematical Journal of Modelling and Forecasting 3.1 (June 2025), pp. 47–55. DOI: 10.24036/mjmf.v3i1.40 .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.41556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Fatimah Fuzzaroh, Berlian Setiawaty, I Gusti Putu Purnaba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.