Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

ABJADIA (e-ISSN: 2443-0587) is an international journal that aims to publish the results of research and technological innovation in the field of education, learning and training. ABJADIA target readers are scientists, academics and practitioners in the field of education.

أبجدية هي مجلة دولية تهدف إلى نشر نتائج البحوث والابتكار التكنولوجي في مجال التعليم والتعلم والتدريب. أما القراء المستهدفين لمجلة أبجدية هم العلماء والأكاديميين والممارسين في مجال التعليم.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Each article  will be checked first by the Editorial Board by taking into account the suitability of the field and guidelines of writing in Journal ABJADIA . Each of eligible manuscripts will be processed and sent to Partners Bebestari for reviewed. Article  are not worth it (not in accordance with the focus of the journal Abjadia) will soon be returned to the author for repair.

وسيتم فحص كل مقالة أول مرة من قبل هيئة التحرير عن طريق مراعاة مدى ملاءمة هذا المجال والمبادئ التوجيهية للكتابة في مجلة أبجدية. كل من المقالات المؤهلة سيتم تجهيزها وإرسالها إلى الشركاء المراجعين لاستعراضها. أما المقالة التى يستحق نشرها (أوليست موافقة لتركيز مجلة أبجدية) فسيتم قريبا إعادتها للمؤلف للإصلاح.


Publication Frequency

Abjadia Journal every year publishes 1 volume consisting of 2 editions (Issues). Odd editions (1) are published between January - June, while even editions are published between July - December every year.

سيتم نشر مجلة أبجدية السنوية (المجلد) في نسختين (رقمان). العدد 1 للمقالات التي تدخل في يناير - يونيو. العدد 2 للمقالات التي تدخل في يوليو - ديسمبر.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

توفر هذه المجلة وصولاً مفتوحًا ومباشرًا إلى محتواها بناءً على المبدأ القائل بأن إتاحة الأبحاث للجمهور بحرية تدعم تبادلًا عالميًا أكبر للمعرفة.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Screening for Plagiarism

In the publication, the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education strongly opposes plagiarism on its own merits. The ABJADIA : International Journal of Education is committed to blocking plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.

Authors must ensure that they have written the original work completely, and if the author has used the work and/or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author strongly advised. Also, an important part of the work has not been published. The author also respects the writing in the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education of publication, duplicate, or excessive fraud.

Before the author submits a script to the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education at least to first check the use of plagiarism. When submitting published articles for authenticity checks, the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education recommends the use of Turnitin, Scanner from http://turnitin.com/. Before using Plagiarism Turnitin for the first time, we strongly recommend that authors read the instructions for using this plagiarism detector. The detector plagiarism system for the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education uses and is affiliated with Turnitin.

* Please note that the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education affiliated with Turnitin. *

The article has not been published in other media and does not contain plagiarism. Preferably the author should use reference management software, eg for Mendeley. The bibliography and reference system for the ABJADIA : International Journal of Education uses Mendeley and Turnitin.


Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Review Guidelines

Mitra Bebestari melakukan penelaan sesuai dengan daftar cek yang telah diberikan dengan putusan:

  1. Naskah diterima tanpa perbaikan penulis dan harus cepat diberitahukan kepada penulis.
  2. Naskah diterima dengan perbaikan kecil, dimana butir-butur perbaikan harus dijelaskan secara rinci.
  3. Naskah diterima dengan perbaikan mendasar atau banyak, perlu ditelaah ulang setelah revisi. Jika masih belum sesuai, penulis perlu diberitahukan dan diminta untuk memperbaikinya.


Revision Guidelines

The paper that has received the results of the review is expected to be immediately revised to adjust the suggestions and questions that exist in the review results. The author is given no later than 15 days to revise his paper counted since the submission of the review results. If at that time the author does not upload the revised paper, then the paper will not be refused to be published (reject). Renewal time extensions can be obtained in accordance with strong demand and reason. The revised paper is further uploaded to Journal website and also sent via email ABJADIA : International Journal of Education

Following the provisions of the revised paper in Journal :

  1. When a reviewer gives comment on paper (in the comment box), the writer asked to directly reply to that comment box. The answer from the author can be Information that has been done revision or reason/argumentation if the author is not willing to revise for some reason (please can be submitted in the comments field already available briefly and details).

  2. Revised on paper or additional material/sentence please block yellow highlighter.

  3. Attached sample of revision process paper in Journal to facilitate revision process by the author.