The Effect of STAD with Handouts versus Direct Instruction on Nahwu Learning Outcomes of Grade VIII Students at SMP IT Al-Ishlah Maros

Suci Amalia, Muhammad Yaumi, M. Shabir U

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the effect of applying the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model assisted by handouts on the nahwu learning outcomes of Grade VIII students at SMP IT Al-Ishlah Maros. It also compares the learning outcomes between students who are taught using the STAD cooperative learning model with handout assistance and those who receive direct instruction. The background of this research is based on the low nahwu learning outcomes, which are attributed to less varied teaching methods and limited instructional time. The study employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design, specifically the posttest-only control group design. The population consisted of all Grade VIII students at SMP IT Al-Ishlah Maros in the current academic year, totaling 112 students. The sample, determined through purposive sampling, comprised 42 students divided into two classes: the experimental class, which used the STAD model with handout assistance, and the control class, which used direct instruction. The research instrument was a learning achievement test in the form of multiple-choice items and sentence construction tasks. The results showed a significant difference in learning outcomes between the students taught using the STAD model with handout assistance, who achieved a higher average score of 79.17, and those taught using direct instruction, who obtained a lower average score of 42.17. This finding was confirmed by an independent t-test, which produced a t-value of 10.208 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. The implications of this study indicate that the STAD cooperative learning model assisted by handouts can serve as an effective alternative to improve students’ nahwu learning outcomes. Therefore, teachers are encouraged to incorporate this model as part of their instructional strategies.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc.

Bahrul Hayat, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa di MTs NU Putra 2 Buntet Pesantren. Tsaqafatuna: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.54213/tsaqafatuna.v3i2.76

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Daryanto. (2016). Media Pembelajaran. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dewi, Y. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbantuan Handout Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kompetensi Siswa. EDU-BIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.30631/edubio.v6i2.16

Guzman, J. F., & Paya, E. (2020). Direct Instruction vs Cooperative Learning in Physical Education : Effects on Student Learning, Behaviors, and Subjective Experience. Sustainability, 12(12), 4893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124893

Humaira, Saputro, S., & Setyowati, W. A. E. (2019). Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) dan Numbered Head Together (NHT) Berbantuan Media Handout terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Materi Sistem Periodik Unsur Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v8i2.29032

Juraini, Taufik, M., & Gunada, I. W. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ( Student Team Achievement Division ) dengan Metode Eksperimen Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Fisika pada Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Labuapi Tahun Pelajaran 2015 / 2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, II(2), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.293

Kosasih, E. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. PT Bumi Aksara.

Laa, N., Winata, H., & Meilani, R. I. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student teams achievement division terhadap minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 2(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v2i2.8115

Ma’arif, M., Fauziah, M., & Fauzi, R. (2020). Efectiveness of Direct Instruction for Learning Models Improving Batik Skills in Basic School Students in Sanggar Batik Cikadu. Jurnal PAJAR; Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i1.7894

Permana, R. A., & Ikasari, D. (2023). Uji Normalitas Data Menggunakan Metode Empirical Distribution Function Dengan Memanfaatkan Matlab Dan Minitab 19. Semnas Ristek (Seminar Nasional Riset Dan Inovasi Teknologi), 7(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.30998/semnasristek.v7i1.6238

Pristiwanti, D., Badariah, B., Hidayat, S., & Dewi, R. S. (2022). Pengertian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 7911–7915. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.9498

Priyanto, E. (2021). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Hasil IPA pada Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 2 Cikarang Barat Kabupaten Bekasi Melalui Metode Diskusi di Semester 1 Tahun 2018/2019. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(8), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.47601/AJP.66

Purwanti, S., & Gafur, A. (2018). Penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar PKn. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v15i2.22673

Romdomiyah, F. F. (2023). Pendekatan Holistik dalam Perencanaan Pendidikan Islam: Strategi dan Implementasi di Era Modern. Epistemic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.70287/epistemic.v2i3.170

Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching Functions. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 376–391. http://www.formapex.com/telechargementpublic/rosenshine1986a.pdf

Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains : valued pedagogy , problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x

Sholeha, R., & Muassomah, M. (2021). STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model in Learning Understanding Abilities in MTs Nurul Islam Lumajang. Abjadia : International Journal of Education, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v6i1.11230

Slavin, R. E. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. In N. Yusron (Trans.), Cet. XVII (p. 12,143,). Nusa Media.

Wulandari, I. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ( Student Teams Achievement Division ) dalam Pembelajaran MI. Jurnal Papeda, 4(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v4i1.1754

Yudaningsih, N. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Era Society 5.0 (Blended Learning) (A. H. Prasetyo (ed.); Issue July). Insania.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v11i1.36065

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Suci Amalia, Muhammad Yaumi, M. Shabir U

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

...............................................................................................................................................................

Mailing Address:

Ruang Jurnal Abjadia, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan (FITK)
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang 65144, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Phone/Faximile: (+62341) 552398, Cell Phone: +62 81 333 666 063
Website: http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/abjadia
Email: abjadia@uin-malang.com

...............................................................................................................................................................

Abjadia: International Journal of Education. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

...............................................................................................................................................................

Indexed by: