Understanding Educational Quality: A Mixed-Method Study of Elite and Government Schools in Sukkur

Shumaila Aqeel, Popoola Kareem Hamed, Ayman Aied Mohammed Mamdouh

Abstract


This study explores how elite private schools compare to government secondary schools in District Sukkur, Sindh. By employing a mixed-method approach, the research looks into essential factors such as the school environment, teaching methods, qualifications of teachers and headmistresses, student outcomes, and dropout rates. The findings highlight significant differences between the two types of schools, with elite institutions performing better in creating supportive learning environments, fostering teacher collaboration, and achieving higher student satisfaction. Quantitative data were gathered through surveys, while qualitative insights were obtained from interviews, providing a thorough analysis. The results emphasize the importance of adequate facilities and effective teamwork in improving educational quality. These insights are crucial for policymakers and educators aiming to tackle educational inequalities and enhance government school systems.


Keywords


School Performance; Elite; Government Schools; Sukkur; Educational Quality; Teacher Collaboration; School Environment; Mixed-Method Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aziz, M., Al-Hasani, A. M. A., & Buriro, G. A. (2018). A correlation analysis of ESL learners’ textual comprehension performance, higher order thinking skills and type of background schooling. Res. J. Social Sci, 16, 83-95.

Ahmed, Z. S. (2018). A critique of the need and application of peace education in Pakistan. Asian Journal of peacebuilding, 6(1), 99-112.

Ali, S., & Tahir, M. S. (2009). Reforming education in Pakistan–tracing global links. Institute for Educational Development, Karachi.

Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, 5-22.

Awan, A. G., & Zia, A. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Educational Institutions: A case study of District Vehari-Pakistan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(16), 122-130.

Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of education, 65-76.

Coleman, J. (1981). Public schools, private schools, and the public interest. The Public Interest, 64, 19.

Card, D. (1999). The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings. Handbook of labor economics/Elsevier.

Curle, A. (1964). Education, politics and development. Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 226-245.

Espinoza, O. (2008). Alternative Approaches on Society, State, Educational Reform, and Educational Policy. World Studies in Education, 9(2), 57-82.

Espinoza, O. (2010). Alternative approaches on society, state, educational reform, and educational policy. The politics of education reforms, 87-108.

Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). f 17G73.

Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of economic literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.

Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. High-and Low-Income.

Hanushek, E. A. (2020). Education production functions. In The economics of education (pp. 161-170). Academic Press.

Heckman, J. J., Humphries, J. E., Veramendi, G., & Urzua, S. S. (2014). Education, health and wages (No. w19971). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hyder, C. M. (1968). Development of the North Carolina Education Association, 1884-1967. Duke University.

Khattak, S. G. (2014). A comparative analysis of the elite–English-medium schools, state Urdu-medium schools, and Dini-madaris in Pakistan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Comparative Studies, 1(1), 92-107.

Malik, A. H. (2015). A comparative study of elite English-medium schools, public schools, and Islamic Madaris in contemporary Pakistan. Lulu. com.

Majoka, M. I., Fazal, S., & Khan, M. S. (2013). Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Education Course: A Case from Teacher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and research, 35(2), 37-53.

Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445-458.

Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 305-306.

Shakeel, M. D., & DeAngelis, C. A. (2018). Can private schools improve school climate? Evidence from a nationally representative sample. Journal of School Choice, 12(3), 426-445.

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of educational research, 83(3), 357-385.

Zafar, N., & Salahuddin, A. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Role of Private and Public Sector for Promotion of Quality Education at Elementary Level. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 10(2), 123-130.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v8i2.32860

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Shumaila Aqeel, Popoola Kareem Hamed, Ayman Aied Mohammed Mamdouh

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/