Assimilation Process In Tamil And Arabic Languages: A Contrastive Study
Abstract
Whenever a person learns a second or foreign language, who is aware of the grammar of his mother tongue alone, it significantly impacts learning the second language. Challenges faced in learning a second or foreign language can be decreased by the comparative study of the grammar of the two languages. Accordingly, this research tries to study sound assimilation in Arabic and Tamil languages comparatively. The research problem concerns whether there are similarities between the two different languages from two other families in the assimilation process. This research aims at a comparative study of the assimilation of sound between Arabic and Tamil languages. This object is tried to be achieved through the qualitative research methodology under descriptive analysis for the secondary data analysis. While both languages are available from two different families, the assimilation process happens in consonant letters alone. Assimilation occurs in both of these languages due to the factors like place of articulation, characteristics of sounds, and place of vowel and consonant letters. In contrast, in the Tamil language, a word is divided into morphemes, and the homogeneity between the morphemes impacts the assimilation of sound. However, dissimilation occurs in these two languages due to sounds' characteristics and vowels' impact on consonants. The morphemes of the Tamil language have unique meanings. This research has identified that the types of good assimilation are the same for the two languages, while complete assimilation is an added type in Arabic. On such a background, this research would hopefully assist those who learn Arabic as a second language with the mother tongue of Tamil.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, ‘Aadil Ash-Sheikh. 2009. Muqaddima fee ‘ilm al-aswaat. Ed.2. Malaysia: International Islamic University.
Abu-Mansour, M. H. (1996). Voice as a privative feature: Assimilation in Arabic. Amsterdam Studies In The Theory And History Of Linguistic Science Series 4, 201-232.
Abu-Mansour, M. H. (1996). Voice as a privative feature: Assimilation in Arabic. AMSTERDAM STUDIES IN THE THEORY AND HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC SCIENCE SERIES 4, 201-232.
Ahana, M. R. F., Aliyar, A. B. M., & Zunoomy, M. S. (2022). Identifying Grammatical Mistakes among Learners of Arabic as a Second Language (Undergraduates of the Department of Arabic language of South Eastern University of Sri Lanka as a Model): Sprin Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 46-57.
Al-Fozan, Abdulrahman Ibrahim. 1989. Assimilation in Classical Arabic – A Phonological Study. University of Glasgow.
Al-Haaj, Hanafi Dawla. 2004. ‘ilm al-sarf al-mutaqaddam li aghralin ‘ilmiyya. Malaysia: International Islamic University.
Ali, Z. A. (2012). A Phonological Study of English and Arabic Assimilation: A Contrastive study. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), (25), 156-211.
Al-Mursafee, ‘Abdul Fattah. 1982. Hidaya al-qaari ila tajweedi kala:mil ba:ri. Ed.1. Saudi: KSA.
Al-Musarava, Jaza Muhammad. 2017. Al-mumathala fil Arabiyya: Ru’ya Jadeeda. Dirasat, Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 44, issue.3.
Anees, Ibrahim. 1975. Al-aswaat al-lughawiyya. Ed.5. Egypt: Maktaba al-Anjalu al-misriyya.
Ashour, Hadeel Mohammad. (2017). Major Differences between Arabic and English Pronunciation Systems: A Contrastive Analysis Study. AIJLLS. 1(1).
Dhanavendan, K., & Raja, L. R. (2016). Phonological processes of 2.6 to 6 years old typically developing Tamil speaking children. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 3(5), 199-204.
Faiq, Aseel Muhammad and Israa, Burhanuddin. (2017). The Process of Dissimilation in English and Arabic: A Comparative Study. Journal of Al – Frahedis Art. N29. Retrieved from http://www.jaa.tu.edu.iq.
Ganesan, S.N . 1975. Contrastive Grammar of Hindi and Tamil. India: University of Madras.
Husam ad-dheen. 1985. Usool tura:thiyya fee ‘ilmil lugha. Cairo: Maktabatul Anjlul Misriyya.
Ibn Jinny, Abu ‘uthman. 2006. Al-khasais. Beirut: ‘alam al-kutub.
Imam, A. T., & Alaraif, J. A. (2017). The Computation of Assimilation of Arabic Language Phonemes. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(12).
Iwaz, Sami and Sayeed Hussain, Salahudeen. (2009). At-Tagirat as-Sawtiyya wa Qawaninuha (al-Mafhoom wa al-Mustalah). Majallat Jami’a Tashreen lilbuhoos wa ad-Dirasat al-‘ilmiyya. 31(1).
Jameel, Ibtasam Hussain. (2010). Al-Aswat as-Su’ba fee nutqiha wa ithrakiha li muta’llimi al-Arabiyya min an-Natiqeen bigairiha. Majallat al-Jami’a al-Islamiyya. 12(8).
Jasim, Jasim Ali and Jasim, Zaidhan Ali. (2001). Nazhriyya ‘ilm al-Luga at-Taqabuli fee at-Turas al-Arabi. Majallat at- Turas al-Arabi. 83, 84.
Jasim, Jasim Ali. (2013). Dirasat Taqabuliyya baina al-Lugatain al-Arabiyya wa al-Malaysiya ‘ala mustawa al-‘adhadh. Majjat ad-Dirasat al-Lugawiyya. 15(2).
Karuṇākaraṉ, K., Jeyā, W. 1997. Moḻiyiyal. Cheṉṉai: Kumaraṉ patippakam.
Kholisin, K., Tohe, A., & Dariyadi, M. W. (2022). The Social Religious Values Behind The Morphophonemic Rules Of Assimilation In Arabic. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 5(1).
Lado, Robert. 1976. Linguistics across cultures. An Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Muhammadu Sainulabdeen, M. Z., Israth, U. ., & Aaqil, A. . (2022). Contrastive Study on Differences in Sentence Aspects between Arabic, Tamil, and English Languages. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 7(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v7i2.2643
Muhammed Rishwan, Rawfat Ahmed. (2013). Al-Maqta’ as-Sawtii baina al-Lugataini al-Arabiyya wa al-Farisiyya Dirasat Taqabuliyyah fee zhawi ‘ilm al-Luga al-Hathees. Majallat Kulliyya al-Adhab. 35.
Nuḥmāṉ, M.A. 2002, a. Ārampa, idainilai vakuppukaḷil Tamiḻ moḻi kaṟpittal - oru moḻiyiyal aṇuhumuṟai. Colombo: Colombo Tamiḻ sankam.
Nuḥmāṉ, M.A. 2003, b. Adippadait Tamiḻ ilakkaṇam. Ed.3. Colombo: Poobala Singham Book Depot.
Raj, S. J. (2008). Being Catholic the Tamil Way: Assimilation and Differentiation. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, 21(1), 12.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 3-28). Springer, Dordrecht.
Sainulabdeen, Z. M., & Shathifa, M. C. S. (2021). Nizhâm al-Jumal Baina al-Lugatain al-Arabiyyah wa al-Tâmiliyyah: Dirâsah Taqâbuliyyah (Sentence Pattern between Arabic and Tamil Languages: A Contrastive Study). Loghat Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 2(2), 105-126.
Salih, A. H. (2012). Sound Assimilation in English and Arabic: a contrastive study. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), (25), 156-169.
Salih, A. H. (2012). Sound Assimilation in English and Arabic: a contrastive study. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), (25), 156-169.
Salih, Abeer Hadi. n.d.. Sound Assimilation in English and Arabic. : A contrastive study. Journal of the college of languages, issue (25).
Seenivasan, R. 1980, a. Moḻiyiyal. India: Cheṉṉai aṇiyakam.
Seenivasan, R.. 1999, b. Moḻi oppiyalum varalāṟum. Ed.4. India: Cheṉṉai aṇiyakam.
Shathifa, M. C. S. & Zunoomy, M. S. (2022). ‘Anâshir al-Jumal baina al-Lughataini al-‘Arabiyyah wa at-Tâmiliyyah (Dirâsâh Taqâbuliyyah). International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 4(01), 56-68.
Subramanian, C. 1998. Pēchcholiyiyal. Ed.1. Tamiḻnādu: Nāṭṭār vaḻakkāṟṟiyal āyvu maiyam.
Suntharesan, V. (2013). Assimilation of English Borrowings in Jaffna Tamil. Language in India, 13(4).
Umar. 1997. Dirasa al-sawt al-lughawee. Ed.3. Cairo: ‘alam al-kutub.
Waafi. 2004. ‘ilm al-lugha. Ed.9. Egypt: Nahda Misr linnashr wat tawzeegh.
Zainab, A.Ali. n.d.. A phonological Study of English and Arabic Assimilation: A contrastive study. Journal of the college of languages, issue (25).
Zunoomy, M. S., & Munas, M. H. A. (2021). Common Mistakes in Creating Sentences Consisting of a Subject and Predicate and in Translating them to Tamil: A Case Study of Undergraduates of the Department of Arabic Language of South Eastern University of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(12), 152-157.
Zunoomy, M. S., & Shathifa, M. C. S. (2021). Difficulties faced by second language learners of Arabic when translating Tamil sentences into Arabic. IJAS: Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies, 3(1), 69-96.
Zunoomy, M. S., & Shathifa, M. C. S. (2022). ‘Anâshir al-Jumal baina al-Lughataini al-‘Arabiyyah wa at-Tâmiliyyah (Dirâsâh Taqâbuliyyah). International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 4(01), 56-68.
Zunoomy, M. S., Munas, M. H. A., & Israth, U. (2021). Tahadhdhiyya Tarjama Adhawaat ar-Rabt baina al-Lugataini al-Injiliziyya wa al-Arabiyya. 8th International Symposium, Faculty of Islamic Studies & Arabic Language, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka. http://192.248.66.13/handle/123456789/5668
Zunoomy, M.S. & Munas, M.H.A. (2021). Nominal and Verbal Sentences & their Aspects: a contrastive linguistics study between Tamil & Arabic Languages. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews – IJRAR, 8(3), 540-544. http://www.ijrar.org/IJRAR21C1701.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v5i3.15147
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammed Cassim Sithy Shathifa, Mohammed Haneefa Abdul Munas, Mohamed Haniffa Mohamed Nairoos, Muhammadu Sainulabdeen Zunoomy
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/