Item Analysis Of Arabic Language Examination

Ihwan Mahmudi, Afni Nurwardah, Siti Nikmatul Rochma, Agung Nurcholis

Abstract


Assessment and evaluation are needed to determine how student competence is compatible with predetermined educational goals. This study aims to analyze the Midterm Exam for odd-semester Arabic subjects at Islamic Junior High. The type of research used in this research is descriptive quantitative research. This study uses the documentation method for data collection. In addition, researchers will use the help of a computer program, namely Anathes 4.0.2. The results showed that: (1) The validity test of 15 multiple choice test questions was declared valid (80%). As well as for the validity test of 5 matching test questions they were declared valid (80%). (2) The reliability test of multiple choice test items is 0.87. In contrast, the results of the reliability of matchmaking test items were 0.76. (3) The difficulty level test of the multiple test questions categorized as hard is 0 items (0%), medium is three items (20%), and easy is 12 items (80%). The difficulty level test of the matching test questions categorized as hard is 0 items (0%), medium is four items (80%), and easy is 1 item (20%). (4) The difficulty level test of the Multiple test questions categorized as bad is 1 item (6,66%), enough is two items (13,3%), good is nine items (60%), and Very Good is three items (20%). The difficulty level test of the matching test questions categorized as bad is 0 items (0%), enough is 1 item (20%), good is 0 items (0%), and Very Good is four items (80%). With these results, the test takers or teachers must increase their attention to the analysis of the items, namely in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminatory power.

Keywords


Item analysis; Validity; Reliability; Difficulty level; Differential Power

Full Text:

PDF

References


Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta‐Analysis of School‐Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Fikriyah, N. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Tengah Semester Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Kelas VII Semester Ganjil SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2019 / 2020. Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 3(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.18196/mht.v3i2.10501

Firmansyah, H. (2018). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Pilihan Ganda Mata Pelajaran Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Wonosari Tahun Ajaran 2017-2018. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginers (3rd editio). New Delhi: Sage Publication India Pvt Ltd.

Lee, J., Yoon, W., Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, S., So, C. H., & Kang, J. (2020). BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics, 36(4), 1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682

Leona. (1997). Al-Ikhtibaaraat wa al-Maqayiis. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruuq.

Madkur, A. A. (1991). Tadriisu Funuuni al-Lughoh al-’Arobiyah. Kairo: Dar al-Syawaf.

Mahmudi, I. (2020a). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Sleman: Lintang Books.

Mahmudi, I. (2020b). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Sosial. Sleman: Lintang Books.

Mahmudi, I., & Ahmad, R. R. F. (2020). Item Analysis of Islamic Education For Class VIII at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo. Educan : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v4i1.4565

Makhisoh, I., & Suroyya, E. N. (2022). Analisa Butir Soal Ujian Madrasah Bahasa Arab Menurut Taksonomi Bloom. Muhadasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 4(1), 40–52.

Mustopa, A., Basri, H., & Barlian, U. C. B. (2021). Analisis standar penilaian pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. 09 No. 01, Januari 2021, P. 24.

Nasional, D. P. (2008). Panduan Penulisan Butir Soal.

Oueslati, O., Cambria, E., HajHmida, M. Ben, & Ounelli, H. (2020). A review of sentiment analysis research in Arabic language. Future Generation Computer Systems, 112, 408–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.05.034

Rahman, A. A., & Nasryah, C. E. (2019). Evaluasi Pembalajaran. In Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Ridho, U. (n.d.). Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Jurnal An-Nabighoh Vol. 20 No. 1, 2018, P. 20.

Rusdiana, E. ratna W. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Shaker, M. S., Wallace, D. V., Golden, D. B. K., Oppenheimer, J., Bernstein, J. A., Campbell, R. L., … Wang, J. (2020). Anaphylaxis—a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(4), 1082–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.017

Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020). Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 72, 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v6i3.19821

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.