Rasch Analysis And Driving Teachers' Self-Efficacy Of Arabic Language

Rizka Widayanti, Alfika Syafa Annida, Imas Jihan Syah, Baiq Tuhfatul Unsi, Muhammad Afthon Ulinnuha, Nurul Musyafaah

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the level of self-efficacy of Arabic teachers to become driving teachers. Researchers used a survey method. The data collection technique was carried out using a non-test instrument: a closed questionnaire containing three aspects of self-efficacy. The sample in this study was 14 Arabic teachers spread across Kediri Residency. The data analysis technique uses the Rasch Model, assisted by the Minister 5.6.1.0 application. The data findings show that the instrument's reliability is a logit figure of 0.98 (perfect) and a Cronbach Alpha logit figure of 0.90 (very high). The validity of the instrument shows that the average MNSQ (Mean Square) outfit is 1.02, and the average ZSTD (Z-standard) outfit is -0.3 (valid). Regarding instrument difficulty level, three statements are classified as easy, three as medium, ten as complex, and three as very difficult. Respondent R9P showed the highest respondent ability, while respondent R7L showed the lowest ability. Arabic teachers' magnitude, strength, and generality percentages are 79%, 74%, and 85%. The average percentage level of self-efficacy of Arabic teachers in Kediri residency is 91%, which is classified as very high)


Keywords


Self Efficacy; Arabic Language; Teachers; Driving Teacher; Rasch Model

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. King, L. (2014). Psikologi Umum. Salemba Humanika.

Abd. Qadir Muslim & Tamim Mulloh. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Program Guru Penggerak Sebagai Upaya Regenerasi Supervisor Pendidikan Yang Berkualitas Di Indonesia. Journal Publicuho, 5(3), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.28

Abd-El-Fattah, S. M. (2015). Rasch Rating Scale Analysis of the Arabic Version of the Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale for Adolescents: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Psychology, 06(16), 2161–2180. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.616213

Agustiani, S., & Marlena, L. (2023). Rasch Model: Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Sma Negeri Di Kota Bogor Berdasarkan Kategori Adversity Quotient. Urnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i4.18615

Alagumai, S., D. Curtis, D., & Njora, H. (2005). Applied Rasch Measurement: Book of exemplars. Dordrecth: Springer. Springer.

Alyani, F., & Zahra, R. (2020). Applying rasch model: Adversity quotient analysis of students in mathematics. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i2.1023

Annida, A. S., & Nuha, M. A. U. (2023). The Level of Anxiety of Speaking Arabic Students of Arabic Language Education Program In Practice of The Khitobah 1 Course. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.21154/tsaqofiya.v5i1.230

Ardiyan, L. A., H Lubis, S. H., Ab, R. A., Gultom, S. G., & Simaremare, A. S. (2022). Gambaran Kepemimpingan Pembelajaran Guru Penggerak. Syntax Idea, 3(6), 1000. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v4i06.1871

Bandura, A. (1998). Self-Efficacy. Academic Press.

D. Wright, B., & H. Stone, M. (1979). Best Test Design. Mesa Pres.

Eka Rachmawati, Y. (2012). Hubungan Antara Self Efficacy Dengan Kematangan Karir Pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Awal Dan Tingkat Akhir Di Universitas Surabaya. Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 1(1).

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Soal Kemampuan Membedakan Rangkaian Seri Dan Paralel Melalui Teori Tes Klasik Dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080

Falani, I., Iriyadi, D., Wardani, I. Y., Susanti, H., & Nasuition, R. A. (2022). A Rasch Analysis Of Perceived Stigma Of Covid-19 Among Nurses In Indonesia Questionnaire. Psychological Thought, 15(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v15i1.530

Farhan, A., Herlina, F., Efendi, Kurnia Devy, N., & Mauliza, F. (2021). The Implementation of “Guru Penggerak” (Organizer Teachers) Concept to Innovation of The Discussion Methods in ThermodynamicsCourse. JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian danPengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1).

Fauji, M. R. (2021). Hubungan Antara Self Efficacy Dengan Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Pada Mahasiswa Psikologi Di Universitas Islam Riau Skripsi.

Febrianto, P. T., Maureen, I. Y., & Bachri, B. S. (2023). Evaluation of MBKM Program Implementation in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 16(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i3.20278

Hasfaraini, A. R. (2023). Efikasi Diri Dengan Aspirasi Karir Remaja. 10.

Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah. (2016). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Pengetahuan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan (Pakem) Menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Ilmu Didaktika, 2.

Herian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivaton and Performance of Employees. Nternational Journal of Business and Management, 80–88.

Hewi, L., & Saleh, Muh. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01). https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018

Ilham Tamami, V. (2019). Efikasi Diri dan Aspirasi Karir Siswa untuk Menjadi Pemain Sepakbola Profesional. Acta Psychologia, 1, 80–86.

Liana, L., & Rijanti, T. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Kinerja Guru Dimoderasi Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional.

Mangolo, P. V. C., Tambingon, H. N., Rawis, J. A. M., & Mangantes, M. L. (2022). Supervisi dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Guru Penggerak. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4.

Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn dan Bacon.

Ningrum, A. R., & Suryani, Y. (2022). Peran Guru Penggerak dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. AR-RIAYAH : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd.v6i2.5432

Nuryanti, S., Masykuri, M., & Susilowati, E. (2018). Analisis Iteman dan model Rasch pada pengembangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA.

Prabowo, A. (2021). Kajian Guru Indonesia (Sejarah, Perkembangan Profesi, Penggerak, dan Teknologi). LPPM UNNES.

Praver, M. (2014). Japanese University English Language Teachers’ Selfefficacy Beliefs: A Mixed-Methods Exploration. Temple University Graduate Board.

Prieto, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Rahim, A., & Haryanto, H. (2021). Implementation of Item Response Theory (IRT) Rasch Model in Quality Analysis of Final Exam Tests in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v10i2.51802

Rofiki, M. (2019). Urgensi Supervisi Akademik Dalam Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Di Era Industri 4.0.

Safaria, T. (2016). Peran Efikasi Diri, Pola Asuh Otoritatif, dan Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Kematangan Karir. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.10657

Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., & Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar Di Indonesia.

Stanislaus, S., Prabowo, A., Ahmad, T. A., Purwinarko, A., & Siroj, M. B. (2020). Identifikasi Kemampuan Guru Sebagai Guru Penggerak di Karesidenan Semarang.

Sumintono, B. (2021). Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Asesmen Pendidikan.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Suwandi, R. A., & Supriyanti, A. A. (2021). Analisis tingkat literasi sains siswa pada aspek konteks, konten, dan kompetensi dengan rasch. BIO-PEDAGOGI, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v10i1.51648

Wahdah, N., Hamidah, H., Mubarak, M. R., & Nurtianto, L. (2023). Investigating The Arabic Teachers Efficacy to Become a Driving Teacher. Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 10(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v10i1.32146

Wijaya, A., Mustofa, Moh. S., & Husain, F. (2020). Sosialisasi Program Merdeka Belajar dan Guru Penggerak Bagi Guru SMPN 2 Kabupaten Maros. Jurnal Puruhita, 2(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/puruhita.v2i1.42325

Yunısarı Tutuala, D., Wahyu Widyaningsih, S., A Yenusi, K., & Yusuf, I. (2021). Nalisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Belajar Fisika Pada Pembelajaran Daring Di Sma Ypk Oikoumene Masa Pandemik Covid-19. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika, 3. https://doi.org/10.31540/sjpif.v3i2 . 1395

Yusmaita, E., & Desviani, T. (2023). Analysis of Student’s Chemical Literacy on Buffer Solution Material using the Rasch Model at SMAN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Edukimia, 5(1), 033–038. https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v5.i1.a456




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i2.25473

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Rizka Widayanti, Alfika Syafa Annida, Imas Jihan Syah, Baiq Tuhfatul Unsi, Muhammad Afthon Ulinnuha, Nurul Musyafaah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/