Linguistic Characteristics In The Research Background And Problem Statement In The Doctoral Thesis Of Arabic EFL Students In Malaysia

Monther Al Jarrah, Kais A Kadhim

Abstract


This study explores the linguistic features within the move structures of the research background and problem statement sections in Chapter One of PhD theses written by Arab students in Malaysia. The analysis focuses on four key language elements: verb tense, modality, voice (active and passive), and personal pronouns. A corpus of 30 theses was analyzed to determine common linguistic patterns, revealing significant insights into the language choices of these academic writers. The study employs concordance and hand-tagged analysis to examine verb tense and voice, with manual verification for modality and personal pronouns to ensure accuracy. Eight distinct verb tenses were identified, with the present simple tense being the most frequently used, representing 55.30% of the total instances. This indicates a preference for focusing on current knowledge and ongoing research. In contrast, the past simple and future simple tenses were used to describe past methodologies and future implications, respectively. Modal auxiliaries play a crucial role in conveying sentiments and opinions. The study identified seven modal verbs, with 'can' being the most commonly used, suggesting a focus on possibility over obligation. The analysis of voice patterns revealed a higher occurrence of active voice (79.66%), especially in moves that conveyed up-to-date knowledge. In contrast, passive voice was more common in methodological descriptions, indicating a focus on the actions or subjects rather than the actors. The study also examined the usage of personal pronouns, finding a higher frequency of third-person pronouns, suggesting a more objective narrative style. These findings offer valuable insights into the linguistic choices of Arab EFL students in academic writing, providing a deeper understanding of their communicative intentions and alignment with academic discourse conventions. The results can guide future research on linguistic patterns in academic writing and help educators support EFL students in improving their writing skills.

Keywords


Linguistics; Arab; EFL, Move Structures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, S., & Noor, N.M. (2013). Contrastive Analysis Of The Use Of Lexical Verbs And Verb-Noun Collocations In Two Learner Corpora: WECMEL vs. LOCNESS. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner Corpus Studies In Asia And The World (Vol. 1, pp.139-160). Kobe University

Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Agee, J. (2009). Developing Qualitative Research Question: A Reflective Process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. Bloomsbury Academic & Professional

Al-Busaidi, K. A. (1995). English in The Labour Market In Multilingual Oman With Special Reference To Omani Employees (Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter).

Al-Issa, A. (2002). An Ideological And Discourse Analysis Of English Language Teaching In The Sultanate of Oman (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland, Australia.

Ang, L. H., Hajar, A. R., Tan, K. H., & Khazriyati, S. (2011). Collocations in Malaysian English learners’ writing:A corpus-based EA. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17 (Special Issue),31-44. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/3043/

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Bordens, K.S, and Abbott, B.B. (2008) Research design and methods: a process of approach. (7th Edition). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Campbell, K. W. (1982). Bayesian Analysis Of Extreme Earthquake Occurrences. Part I. Probabilistic hazard model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72(5), 1689-1705.

Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The Impact Of Structure, Environment, And Interdependence On The Perceived Usefulness Of Management Accounting Systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16-35

Creswell, J. (2015). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Pearson Education Inc.

Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (3rd ed.). USA, Boston: Pearson Education.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The Discovery Of Grounded Theory: Strategies For Qualitative Research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

Govindarajan, V. (1984). Appropriateness Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation: An Empirical Examination Of Environmental Uncertainty As An Intervening Variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(2), 125-135.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). “Modality and Modulation in English” in G.R. Kress (ed). Halliday: System and Function in Language. (76-112). Oxford , OUP

Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2012). Performance in The Citing Behavior Of Two Student Writers. Written Communication, 29(1), 55-103.

Hyland, Ken, 2007. Applying A Gloss: Exemplifying And Reformulating In Academic Discourse. Applied Linguistics 28, 266--285.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. New York, NY: Continuum.

Khandwalla, P.N. (1972). The Effect Of Different Types Of Competition On The Use Of Management Controls. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 275-285.

Kinmond, K. 2012. Coming Up With A Research Question. Pp. 23-36 in C. Sullivan, S. Gibson and S. Riley (Eds.), Doing Your Qualitative Psychology Project. London: Sage

Lincoln, Y.S., Lynham, S.A. & Guba, E.G. (2011). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contra-Dictions, And Emerging Confluences, Revisited. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (eds),The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Resear ch (4th edn; pp. 97–128). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.

Maxwell,J.A(2013). Qualitive Researches Design An Interactive Approach (uc.ed). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage

Nunan, D., Tyacke, M., & Walton, D. (1987). Philosophy and Guidelines For The Omani English Language School Curriculum. Muscat, Sultanate of Oman: Ministry of Education and Youth.

Palmer, (1979). Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.

Petrić, B., & Harwood, N. (2013). Task requirements, Task Representation, And Self-Reported Citation Functions : An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12, 110–124

Quirk, R. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of English Language. London: Longman

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency As A Fourth Aspect Of Students’ Engagement During Learning Activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.

Rissanen, Matti. (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods And Interpretations In Historical Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.

Simons, R. (2013). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy: Text and Cases: Pearson New International Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Higher

Sunderland, J. (2010). Research question in linguistics. In Litosseliti, L. (ed.), Research methods in linguistics (9–28). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Ting, S. H., Mahadhir, M. & Siew, L. C. (2010). Grammatical Errors In Spoken English Of University Students In Oral Communication Course. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10(11), 53-70

Trochim, W.M. (2006). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. From: http://www. socialresearchmethods.net/kb/.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i3.29349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Monther Al Jarrah, Kais A Kadhim

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/